10/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

4 out of 22 API elements (18.2 %) have documentation comments.

Providing good documentation for libraries, classes, functions, and other API elements improves code readability and helps developers find and use your API. Document at least 20% of the public API elements.

To highlight public API members missing documentation consider enabling the public_member_api_docs lint.

Some symbols that are missing documentation: apple_vision_flutter, apple_vision_flutter.AppleVisionFlutter, apple_vision_flutter.AppleVisionFlutter.AppleVisionFlutter.new, apple_vision_flutter_method_channel, apple_vision_flutter_method_channel.MethodChannelAppleVisionFlutter.MethodChannelAppleVisionFlutter.new.

10/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 1 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ iOS

These platforms are not supported:

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.cn/web/wasm for details.

0/0 points: Swift Package Manager support

This package for iOS or macOS does not support the Swift Package Manager. It will not receive full points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://docs.flutter.dev/to/spm for details.

50/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.