10/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

OUT: Documenting zypay_flutter_sdk... Discovering libraries... Linking elements... Precaching local docs for 652170 elements... Initialized dartdoc with 866 libraries Generating docs for library zypay_sdk.dart from package:zypay_flutter_sdk/zypay_sdk.dart... Generating docs for library examples/basic_usage.dart from package:zypay_flutter_sdk/examples/basic_usage.dart... Generating docs for library zypay_flutter_sdk.dart from package:zypay_flutter_sdk/zypay_flutter_sdk.dart... Documented 3 public libraries in 56.7 seconds ERR: warning: ambiguous reexport of zypay_config.createDefaultConfig, canonicalization candidates: (zypay_flutter_sdk, zypay_flutter_sdk) -> zypay_flutter_sdk (confidence 0.000) from zypay_config.createDefaultConfig: (file:///tmp/pana_WGMXQR/lib/src/core/config/zypay_config.dart:80:13) zypay_flutter_sdk: 1.153 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.1429)) zypay_flutter_sdk: 1.153 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.1429)) Use {@canonicalFor zypay_config.createDefaultConfig} in the desired library's documentation to resolve the ambiguity and/or override dartdoc's decision, or structure your package so the reexport is less ambiguous. The symbol will still be referenced in all candidates -- this only controls the location where it will be written and which library will be displayed in navigation for the relevant pages. The flag [246 more lines]

10/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Android

• ✓ iOS

• ✓ Windows

• ✓ Linux

• ✓ macOS

• ✓ Web

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.cn/web/wasm for details.

40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 4 issues. Showing the first 2:

   ╷
56 │         print('$formattedMessage\nData: $data');
   │         ^^^^^
   ╵

   ╷
58 │         print(formattedMessage);
   │         ^^^^^
   ╵

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.